Non-emergency Medical Transportation Accreditation Commission
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 824616684
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Tempe, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 8666368221
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $705,091
- Expenses
- $637,865
- Assets
- $230,387
- Liabilities
- $275,152
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PETER J HICKS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- PETER J HICKS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $132,971 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The non-emergency medical transportation accreditation commission (nemtac) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to elevating the standards and professionalism of the non-emergency medical transportation (nemt) industry. As an impartial, third-party accrediting body accredited by ansi, nemtac focuses on developing industry best practices, certification programs, and accreditation processes that enhance the safety, reliability and efficiency of nemt services. Unlike traditional industry associations, nemtac does not operate on a membership model but instead relies on the expertise and dedication of volunteers who serve on advisory boards to guide its mission.
What it reported doing in 2024
The non-emergency medical transportation accreditation commission (nemtac) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to elevating the standards and professionalism of the non-emergency medical transportation (nemt) industry. As an impartial, third-party accrediting body accredited by ansi, nemtac focuses on developing industry best practices, certification programs, and accreditation processes that enhance the safety, reliability and efficiency of nemt services. Unlike traditional industry associations, nemtac does not operate on a membership model but instead relies on the expertise and dedication of volunteers who serve on advisory boards to guide its mission.a core part of nemtac's nonprofit mission is to provide high-quality education through nationally recognized certification programs, ongoing professional development, and its annual transform conference. These initiatives equip nemt providers, dispatchers, and executives with the knowledge and skills needed to meet evolving industry demands. By offering specialized training and hosting an annual gathering of industry leaders, nemtac ensures that transportation providers stay informed on best practices, regulatory updates, and technological advancements. Through these educational efforts, nemtac strengthens the entire nemt ecosystem, improving service quality and accessibility for the communities that depend on it.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90.5%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.5%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.19; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.8%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 90.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $638K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $133K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.