Noms Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
461530373
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Sandusky, OH, USA
Phone
4196266161
Rating
99
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Pension and Retirement Funds

Reported finances

Revenue
$86,886
Expenses
$54,020
Assets
$347,561
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSHUA G FREDERICK (DIRECTOR & PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JUSTIN D HARRIS (DIRECTOR)
  • JOSHUA G FREDERICK (DIRECTOR & PRESIDENT)
  • RICK A VISCI DO (DIRECTOR & SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The foundation provides financial assistance to individuals and/or families who have sustained substantial economic hardship associated with medical treatments. See narrative on activities under part iv above for a detailed description of the program. The foundation provides grants and/or contributions to various 501(c)(3) organizations.

What it reported doing in 2024

Supported local non-profit organizations in the region; provided hardship grants to individuals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 37.8%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.43; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 19.1% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $204K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.