Noble County Ymca

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
731099310
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Perry, OK, USA
Phone
5803364411
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Young Men's or Women's Associations
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,523,185
Expenses
$1,161,857
Assets
$3,863,823
Liabilities
$199,410

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHRISTI WOODS (TREASURER / CEO)
  • MANDY LOWRY (CEO)
  • KAYLA WEDEL-LOBSINGER (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • MANDY LOWRY (CEO): $51,848 total reported compensation
  • KAYLA WEDEL-LOBSINGER (CEO): $21,012 total reported compensation
  • CHRISTI WOODS (TREASURER / CEO): $7,761 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the noble county ymca is to put christian principles into practice though programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

What it reported doing in 2025

Form 990, part iii, line 4program descriptions: youth development: the noble county family ymca's work in youth development is centered on establishing a whole-person approach to healthy, confident, and hopeful youth, our work seeks to build capacity to support high-quality youth programs throughout the county as a childcare backbone organization, strengthen and establish new strategic partnerships to create more opportunities for youth in our area, and lead programming that allows young people to develop leadership skills, sharpen life skills, build social-emotional resilience, and engage in workforce and post-secondary education development. The y is here to enrich and advocate for experiences that support the social, cognitive, and physical growth of the youth in our community, removing the barriers and obstacles we can. Direct financial assistance, subsidies, and grant-based and workforce development programs are essential to our work in youth development, creating more equitable futures for the young people we serve.healthy living: health is so much more than physical fitness, with social determinants like education, access to health care, and nutrition impacting individual and community-wide quality of life. The noble county family ymca strives to be a community leader in providing programs and services that build health and well-being for all. Our healthy living programs are designed to address community needs through partnerships and promote knowledge and awareness of mental health to reduce stigma. We aim to support the well-being of our community in their fitnessjourneys and connection to community and belonging. We bring families together, encourage good health habits, and foster connections through fitness, sports, and shared interests. We ensure our programs are accessible and affordable to all, providing direct financial assistance and bridging partnerships to connect more people with the y. Everyone is welcome at the y, and we are committed to making our programs inclusive and accessible to all.social responsibility: as a trusted community organization, the noble county family ymca is dedicated to being a force for good for those we serve. Our social responsibility initiatives challenge us to lead the way in addressing critical community issues, including hunger and water safety, food insecurity and drowning pose significant risks to the people of noble county, by leveraging our organization's partnerships, access to resources and education, and our voice in the community, we aim to shift power to our constituents and fill service gaps.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 47
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 36.8%; rating input score 37
  • Program expense ratio: 78.8%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 54%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.33; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.9%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 36.8% of revenue deployed · 78.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $915K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $52K · 13 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $448K reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 59/100.