Nobinden Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205684478
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2007
Location
Rosemead, CA, USA
Phone
3232283719
Rating
56
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$61,000
Expenses
$44,862
Assets
$20,125

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Keno Deary (Exec. Director)
  • Keno Deary Jr (Secretary)
  • Sylicia Brown (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The M. Janet Chin Youth Foundation has provided low to no cost after school youth enrichment programs for the children of working families. With the support of Afterschool Alliance, 11 elementary and middle schools, and the district, M. Janet Chin Youth Foundation has put into place after school programs focusing on arts/entertainment, computer technology (to support academic proficiency and achievements), and fitness/sports activities (to combat childhood obesity.

What it reported doing in 2024

The M. Janet Chin Youth Foundation has provided low to no cost after school youth enrichment programs for the children of working families. With the support of Afterschool Alliance, 11 elementary and middle schools, and the district, M. Janet Chin Youth Foundation has put into place after school programs focusing on arts/entertainment, computer technology (to support academic proficiency and achievements), and fitness/sports activities (to combat childhood obesity).

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 42
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 36.6%; rating input score 37
  • Program expense ratio: 49.7%; rating input score 50

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 26.5%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.45; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -15.5% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 36.6% of revenue deployed · 49.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $22K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.