Noah Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 592385584
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2014
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014
- Location
- Belle Glade, FL, USA
- Phone
- 5619962300
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $236,614
- Expenses
- $284,937
- Assets
- $415,706
- Liabilities
- $60,705
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EDNA O MCCLENDON (PRESIDENT)
- PAULINE LOCKETT (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- EDNA O MCCLENDON (PRESIDENT)
- PAULINE LOCKETT (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CHARLIE LAWS (VICE TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote the general welfare of the community through activities which include childcare programs and social service programs such as parenting, mentoring, family services and rental of housing units to low and moderate income individuals in western palm beach county, fla.
What it reported doing in 2014
Acquiring and refurbishing properties to rent to low and moderate income individuals
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 86.5%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -20.4%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.46; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -99.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -15.8% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -12.9% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 86.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $246K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.