No Kill Nation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
272918023
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Lighthouse Point, FL, USA
Phone
9546485114
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Animal Protection and Welfare

Official website

Reported finances

Expenses
$47,867
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEBRA DAY (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DEBRA DAY (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

No kill nation, inc, is a national no kill advocacy /education/ animal shelter reform organization dedicated to ending the systematic and needless killing of shelter animals in our county/city, tax-funded animal shelters though various educational outreach programs and ongoing support to shelter reformists nationwide.

What it reported doing in 2018

No kill nation, inc. Offers educational, consultanting and support services to no kill advocates, and no kill groups nationwide guiding them through all aspects of animal shelter reform. Educational support is provided through the no kill nation website wich provids in depth information on the no kill philosphy. Using the no kill advocacy center's "no kill equation" model we are afforded the opportunity to teach others out of our area how to implement the "equation" for measurable shelter reform results: live outcomes of 90% and more, thereby saving all healthy and treatable animals in municipal open admission shelters nationwide.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 16
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 42%; rating input score 42

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -11.7% per year; rating input score 0; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -16.3% per year; rating input score 0; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -35.2% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 42% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $20K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2013 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.