No Heart Left Behind Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 208849083
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Covington, LA, USA
- Phone
- 9852648808
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $195,820
- Expenses
- $195,880
- Assets
- $87,481
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- ALICIA STICKLES (Executive Dir.): $27,250 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
No Heart Left Behind Foundation (NHLBF) is a nonprofit organisation incorporated in the state of Louisiana. The corporation is organized for the purpose of promoting the gospel of Jesus Christ as taught in the Holy Bible: provide affordable, faith-based counseling and spiritual guidance, mentorship/discipleship programs and education, and need-based assistance to hurting individuals and broken families. Listed below in order of importance: Counseling: 40%Spiritual Guidance 35%Mentorship/discipleship/education 20%Need based assistance 5%
What it reported doing in 2024
No Heart Left Behind Foundation (NHLBF) is a nonprofit organisation incorporated in the state of Louisiana. The corporation is organized for the purpose of promoting the gospel of Jesus Christ as taught in the Holy Bible: provide affordable, faith-based counseling and spiritual guidance, mentorship/discipleship programs and education, and need-based assistance to hurting individuals and broken families. Listed below in order of importance: Counseling: NHLBF will offer individual counseling, marriage counseling, and group therapy for a low cost honorarium which makes the services affordable to families and individuals in need. Spiritual guidance: Offers spiritual guidance to families and individuals concerning matters of Christian doctrine, Christian identity, and practical family matters based on biblical principles. Mentorship/discipleship/education: Offers mentorship, discipleship, and family-focused education through Bible studies, one-on-one discipleship, retreats, and family-focused podcast.Need based assistance: Through private referral offer need-based financial assistance to families and individuals facing financial crisis.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 52
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.9%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 58.8%; rating input score 59
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.45; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 13.9%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58.9% of revenue deployed · 58.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 6 board members independent · 0 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $115K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $27K · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 7 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.