NNPTC Chief Petty Officer Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
582448528
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Goose Creek, SC, USA
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Military, Veterans' Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$43,385
Expenses
$35,186
Assets
$30,103

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MMNC Jason Schlang (NNPTC CPOA Vice President)
  • MMNCS Chuck Allseitz (NNPTC CPOA President)

People named in this filing

  • MMNC Jackie Heath (NNPTC CPOA Treasurer)
  • MMNC Jason Schlang (NNPTC CPOA Vice President)
  • MMNCS Chuck Allseitz (NNPTC CPOA President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the NNPTC CPOA shall be to foster Esprit de Corps amongst the Chief Petty Officers assigned to Naval Nuclear Power Training Command. Additionally the NNPTC CPOA shall promote the ideals that embody the traditions of Naval Service Provide a forum for the brothers and sisters of the mess to socialize keep members informed on United States Navy matters in order to loyally serve the nation of the United States of America and the United States Navy; provide an instrument that allow members in need whenever and however possible encourage a high degree of professionalism from all members by offering a free interchange of ideas between members; and allow a forum to receive information and concerns affecting the CPO community to the respect of the Commanding Officer.

What it reported doing in 2025

Training Conducted to embody new members with the traditions and values long standing among those in Naval Service

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 74% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.7%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 94.5%; rating input score 95

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 18.9%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76.7% of revenue deployed · 94.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $33K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.