Njttc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
204318078
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Westfield, NJ, USA
Phone
9082491528
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Racquet Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$78,233
Expenses
$70,800
Assets
$79,104
Liabilities
$8,356

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Bernie Formal (Trustee)
  • Chris Shung (Trustee)
  • Wayne Chin (Trustee)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary purpose is to provide a venue for members playing table tennis and promoting table tennis sports. NJTTC provides a friendly facility for coaches to run training clinics and individual lessons. NJTTC has enable training of national adult and junior champions. NJTTC organizes tournaments for the members. It is administered by a volunteer board of trustees elected by its members. The club currently have over 100 members as well as non-members who play on a daily basis. Our main goal is to generate enough revenue to keep the place open.

What it reported doing in 2019

NJTTC hosts NJ State Championship each year. This is the only facility that is authorized by USATT association to host the State Champions. NJTTC also hosted HOPE training camp program for youth in partnership with USATT.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.5%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.12; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 80.8% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2012 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.