Nj Extreme Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 800295929
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Marlboro, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 7325807551
- Rating
- 34
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Baseball, Softball
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $42,639
- Expenses
- $53,146
- Assets
- $4,118
- Liabilities
- $115
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- William Oplinger (President)
People named in this filing
- Alan Zwerin (Treasurer)
- William Oplinger (President)
- Ira Fhima (VP)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
NJ Xtreme, Inc.(d.b.a. NJ Xtreme) is an amateur athletic organization based in Marlboro, NJ. NJ Xtreme fosters national amateur sports competition to support and develop amateur athletes for softball and baseball competition. Through this organization we hope to develop the athletes to be able to compete at the high school, college and professional levels. The activities provided for by the organization are softball and baseball training during the offseason consisting of hitting, fielding and physical training by directors, officers and volunteers of NJ Xtreme at facilities not owned by NJ Xtreme. As well, during the season NJ Xtreme will provide funding for league and tournament fees so that the kids can compete against other organizations locally and regionally. The aim of the organization is to solicit funding through membership fees, each student that registers would be required to make a payment. Also, we would like to hold fund raising events.
What it reported doing in 2014
Softball: Training, Tournaments and Leagues - 4 softball teams players were provided with indoor and outdoor training throughout the year as well as entrance fees to compete in various tournaments and leagues thoughout the year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 78% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -24.6%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -73.9% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -11.1% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -17.1% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.