Nj Aapi a Nj Nonprofit Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
452539752
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2016
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2016
Location
Union, NJ, USA
Phone
9086864603
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Reported finances

Revenue
$33,356
Expenses
$40,229
Assets
$35,873
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • THOMAS ALAPATT MD (PRESIDENT)
  • SANJAY JAIN MD (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • THOMAS ALAPATT MD (PRESIDENT)
  • SANJAY JAIN MD (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SAMIPPAN MUTHUSAMY MD (TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Purposes: The purposes for which the Corporation is to be formed are exclusively for scientific, education, & charitable purposes, including for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations, within the meaning of Section 501 c(3) of the Revenue code of 1954 and in this connection, specifically: 1. To bring together and coordinate the activities of organizations of Physicians, Medical student and other medical scientist of Indian origin, in New Jersey and other areas. 2. To arrange, sponsor and organize seminar and educational programs to acquaint members of new developments in the area of medical science, practice of medicine and health care provisions a delivery systems.

What it reported doing in 2016

To act as laison, spokesperson and co-ordinating body for activities of local chapters of physicians, medical students and other scientists of Indian Origin in New Jersey and surrounding area.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -20.6%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.89; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -28.5% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2014 to 2016
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.