Nj 2-1-1 Partnership a New Jersey Nonprofit Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 223338917
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Cedar Knolls, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9738872772
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,314,237
- Expenses
- $9,111,374
- Assets
- $3,327,987
- Liabilities
- $1,239,865
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MELISSA ACREE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- MELISSA ACREE (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $190,321 total reported compensation
- DON BENNETT (CONTROLLER): $126,497 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's mission is to make the critical connection between individuals and families seeking health and/or human services and the organizations best able to meet their needs.
What it reported doing in 2025
Nj 211 is a statewide nonprofit that provides the 211 service in New Jersey since 2005. 211 service is a free, confidential, multilingual, 24/7 information and referral system accessible by phone, text, chat, andonline search. Through this service, trained specialists assess needs, provide trusted information, and connect residents to nonprofit and government programs that address housing, utilities, food insecurity, healthcare, disaster response, and other critical needs. The 211 service also serves as an important partner to state agencies during emergencies, providing real-time information to the public and data insights to inform response and policy decisions.in 2025, over 337,000 contacts were handled by nj 211 and over 781,000 website searches for help were conducted. Requests for help come from all 21 counties. Every contact is recorded and the data collected is used to provide real-time data on service gaps, trends and emerging needs. Both residents and professionals use nj 211 as a starting point to find help when it is needed most.over the years, nj 211 has grown to incorporate additional programs. Since 2012, nj 211 has served as the state's home energy assistance hotline. In this specialized role, callers are screened for the liheap (low-income home energy assistance program) and the (usf) universal service fund. Assistance with the application process assistance is provided, as well as checking applicants' benefit status. This is in partnership with nj department of community affairs. In 2020, the nj division of family development partnered with nj 211 to operate the centralized state homeless hotline, focusing on after-hours assistance and emergency placements. This is an extremely challenging role, especially during the winter months when code blue is declared 80% of the time. For more information on all our programs and services, visit www.nj211.org.nj 211 maintains national accreditation from inform USA, formerly known as airs, alliance for information and referral systems, since 2015. This stringent process ensures that nj 211 is followingnational standards for operating an information and referral service. All the programs in our resource database are verified, ensuring an up to date and well-maintained resource database. In addition, our service delivery, disaster preparedness, and organizational relationships also follow standards outlined by inform USA.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90.9%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 93.2%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $0.29 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.2%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.37; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.37; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.5%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 90.9% of revenue deployed · 93.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $190K · 14 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4.5M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.