Nizhoni Institute of Midwifery
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 320131849
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Spring City, UT, USA
- Phone
- 6193161318
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adult, Continuing Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $346
- Expenses
- $11,323
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRENT KEIME (Vice President)
- MARLA HICKS (President & CEO)
People named in this filing
- BRENT KEIME (Vice President)
- MARLA HICKS (President & CEO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Midwives are prepared for the scope of practice outlined by the MANA Core Competencies, North American Registry of Midwives Certification Guidelines, and the joint mission statement of the Midwives Alliance of North America and the American College of Nurse-Midwives which is:"The entry level midwife is a primary health care professional who independently provides care during pregnancy, birth and postpartum period for women and newborns within their communities. Services provided by the midwife include education and health promotion. With additional education and experience, the midwife may provide well-women gynecological care, including family planning services. When the care rquired extends beyond the midwife's abilities, the midwife has a mechanism for consultation, referral and continued involvement.".
What it reported doing in 2022
The Nizhoni Institute of Midwifery, Inc exists to provide a professional education for midwives who will promote maternal, infant and family health for communities they service. In addition to specialist midwifery knowledge and skills, midwives share common knowledge with practitioners of nursing, obstetrics, perinatology, behavioral health and complementary medicine.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 98.2%; rating input score 98
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3,172.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -164.7% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 98.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2009 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.