Niwot High School Boosters Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 412078067
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Niwot, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3036522550
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $65,973
- Expenses
- $78,182
- Assets
- $20,876
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRENDA TEIG (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DEBORAH ROTHSTEIN (SECRETARY)
- GRETCHEN JOHNSON (CONCESSIONS)
- SARAH ROBERTS (HOSPITALITY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To aid and encourage the development of niwot high school and its students through the support of school extra curricular activities and to promote an active interest in niwot high school and its students by the community it serves
What it reported doing in 2024
The organization provided funding for supervised, alcohol-free prom after party events. These events offered students a safe and structured environment to celebrate following their prom, reducing the risk of accidents, substance abuse, and other unsafe behaviors commonly associated with unsupervised gatherings. By supporting these after party events, the organization furthered its exempt purpose of advancing the welfare of youth and protecting the community by encouraging safe, healthy, and positive activities for students during a high-risk time.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 69% for direct work, and 31% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.9%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 80.1%; rating input score 80
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.5%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 94.9% of revenue deployed · 80.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $63K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.