Niskayuna Lacrosse Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201620800
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Niskayuna, NY, USA
Phone
5189287261
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Recreation& Sports N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$91,630
Expenses
$84,068
Assets
$148,370
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN SWEENEY (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • JEFFREY SCARDINO (PRESIDENT)
  • STEPHEN FRANCE (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DAVID GRECO (EQUIPMENT DIRECTOR)
  • THOMAS CASEY (FACILITIES/PROPERTY DIRECT)
  • JESSICA IRWIN (GIRLS DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The corporation was formed to fill a need for an organized group in the niskayuna, New York area dedicated to promoting the game of amateur lacrosse. The corporation will serve to foster an appreciation of the sport of lacrosse by providing support and coaching for youth playing the sport, supporting adult lacrosse programs, sponsoring tournaments and leagues, educating the general public about the sport, and acting to maintain the integrity and sportsmanship of all aspects of the game of lacrosse.

What it reported doing in 2025

Over 300 participants in the 2025 program participated in numerous area tournaments, held or sponsored training programs games and tournments 10 months of the year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 68% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.3%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.76; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.3%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -28.9% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.