Nine Fruits Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 912156236
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV, USA
- Phone
- 6509621900
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Specialized Education Institutions
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,639,794
- Expenses
- $1,580,204
- Assets
- $8,473,139
- Liabilities
- $14,067
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- YVETTE LIU (President & Sec)
Highest reported compensation
- YVETTE LIU (President & Sec): $415,670 total reported compensation
- YU-CHUN CHANG (Treasurer): $221,752 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of this organization is to let students recognize and discover their talents, to help them reach their fullest potenital, and to prepare them for an even brighter future.specifically focusing on bird and rainforest protection is only part of the organization's programs.the purpose of the nine fruits corporation as a nonprofit public benefit entity is to provide afforable supplemental education for the public and to fund and support other public charities and nonprofit organizations. Emphasis at the present time will be to support charities that help the children around the world (china, south america, us etc.) who are really in need and also deserve an opportunity to go to school and churches or other non-profit organizations for missionary trip to spread the gospel.
What it reported doing in 2025
The primary goal of this organization is to provide after school enrichment programs such as: math and English enrichment/tutoring, Chinese language programs, drawing, ceramincs, dance, music, drama and Kung-fu, etc., for school age children with low and affordable price, and with the best possible teachers. This organization also sponsors various children's Art exhibitions to promote artamong school age students.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 44
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 63
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 38.5%; rating input score 38
- Program expense ratio: 69.7%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 11
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 40.1%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.36; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 40.3%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 38.5% of revenue deployed · 69.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $416K · 5 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.