Nihonmachi Legal Outreach Dba Asian Pacific Islander Legal Outreach
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 942583284
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5102512846
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Legal Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,604,150
- Expenses
- $5,407,542
- Assets
- $6,549,688
- Liabilities
- $1,280,976
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- DEAN ITO TAYLOR (EXEC DIRECTOR): $154,477 total reported compensation
- KUAN SONG (DEPUTY DIRECTOR): $128,846 total reported compensation
- Akiko Takeshita (MANAGING ATTORNEY): $126,534 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Api legal outreach works to tear down long-standing barriers that have denied asiansand pacific islanders equal justice and equal access to the american legal system.
What it reported doing in 2024
Human traffickingpreying on the desperation and dreams of vulnerable immigrants around the world, human traffickers lure their victims to the u.s. With false promises and tales ofliving the american dream. Most victims are pulled to the u.s. By the hope ofopportunity and pushed from their home country by the lack of the same chances ofmaking a better life for themselves and their loved ones. But once in the u.s., theexperiences of these individuals are strikingly similar: abuse, threats of violenceand retaliation, elimination of personal liberty and free agency, and dehumanizingtreatment that crushes the dignity, self esteem, and self worth of the victim. For the fortunate few that are able to escape their trafficking situations, these men, women, and children all too often deal with seemingly insurmountable challenges of daily survival: they are in a foreign land, unable to speak english, terrified of police and immigration, no knowledge about available help or resources, and little or no money or even any idea about where they will be sleeping that night.the anti-trafficking project of api legal outreach serves these needs. We providelegal representation to these individuals to stabilize their immigration status, protect and advocate for them during the ensuing criminal investigation andprosecution, and work with our sister agencies in the asian anti-traffickingcollaborative (aatc) to provide them with a place to live, medical help, aidobtaining refugee benefits, counseling, as well as job training and placement forthe future.api legal outreach is the only legal organization in the entire state of California that provides comprehensive legal services to victims of human trafficking. The u.s. Department of justice has recognized our collaborative, holistic approach, selecting aatc as one of only 3 programs in the entire country to be replicated on a national basis.the trade in human bodies is overwhelming in scope and there is a tremendous amountof work and advocacy that must be done to try to reach and eliminate the source ofhuman trafficking as well as ensure the safety and well-being of victims. Therefore, in addition to our legal work, we use a multi-level strategy in our anti-traffickingproject to deal with the numerous issues involved in human trafficking through theprovision of technical assistance and trainings, policy and legislative advocacy atlocal, state, and federal levels, and continuing community education and outreach tosister agencies and the general public.by the numbers:** 200: the number of men, women, and children survivors of human trafficking thathave been served by api legal outreach's anti-trafficking project and the asiananti-trafficking collaborative (aatc)** 15+: the number of different countries of origin of survivors in the greater bay area served by aatc. These countries include: china, egypt, guatemala, honduras, india, indonesia, japan, kenya, korea, malaysia, mexico, nigeria, philippines, russia, taiwan, thailand, and others.** 2: age of our youngest survivor** 63: age of our oldest survivormore than 50% of the cases involved forced labor other than sex trafficking, such asdomestic servitude, restaurant work, servile marriage, and even professionaloccupations such as nursing and teaching.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 87% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.8%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 92.9%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.39 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.5%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.21; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.2; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.8%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.8% of revenue deployed · 92.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $154K · 18 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.