M.A.S. Foundation
Legal name: Nicole E Mas Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 453613247
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Miami, FL, US
- Phone
- (786) 353-4560
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Foundations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $128,234
- Expenses
- $50,354
- Assets
- $192,171
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARIA E DEL VALLE MAS (PRESIDENT)
- RAFAEL J MAS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ILDEFONSO J MAS (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MARIA E DEL VALLE MAS (PRESIDENT)
- RAFAEL J MAS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ILDEFONSO J MAS (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To make a positive impact on the less fortunate through compassion, respect and humility.
What it reported doing in 2024
The foundation has chosen to sponser the "hogar escuela rosa duarte", led by daughters of charity of st. Vincent de paul, which is located in santo domingo, dominican repulic. The hogar escuela rosa duarte is an orphanage consisting of an estimated 146 abandoned, abused, and homeless girls. The mission is to aid the orphanage by providing basic necessities such as toiletries, feminine products, and food and clothing.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 87% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 36
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 88
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 23.3%; rating input score 23
- Program expense ratio: 59.3%; rating input score 59
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 60.7%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.82; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 7 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 4 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 23.3% of revenue deployed · 59.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $30K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 23/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.