Nicole Capuana Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330644122
- IRS 990-PF coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-PF 2025
- Location
- Utica, NY, USA
- Phone
- 3157949048
- Rating
- 93
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Child Abuse, Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $102,690
- Expenses
- $22,225
Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Overview
Mission
Child Abuse, Prevention
What it reported funding in 2025
The foundation reported 1 grant totaling $21,500. The stated grant purpose was the nicole capuana foundation is organized to provide assistance and support to individuals, families and groups seeking aid due to hardship, financial shortfall and in need of charitable contributions. in addition, the organization provides assistance and support to individuals, families, groups and other organizations seeking the recovery of missing and/or exploited children. the assistance is charitable in nature and is given to those demonstrating financial aid. the foundation will follow the tax-exempt purposes as set forth in section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code. the foundation does not discriminate against individuals based on gender, heritage, race and religion. relationships will be developed with other charitable organizations involved with similar objectives..
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the foundation's positive operating resources came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The foundation distributed 100% of its reported charitable disbursements as grants.
- Includes asset-sale income: Asset-sale income is shown separately from recurring resources when classifying the revenue model.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes to charitable grants and the filed numbers largely add up. Assets provide a limited cushion relative to annual grants.
Rating breakdown
- Grant Deployment: 100
- Cost Efficiency: 97
- Transparency: 100
- Compliance: 100
- Endowment Health: 37
Detailed rating inputs
Grant Deployment
- Grant deployment ratio: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Cost Efficiency
- Grant expense ratio: 96.7%; rating input score 97; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency
- Grant recipient disclosure: Yes; rating input score 100
Compliance
- Part VII-B activity disclosures: 19 of 19 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Property sale or exchange with a disqualified person: Pass
- Borrowing from or lending to a disqualified person: Pass
- Goods, services, or facilities involving a disqualified person: Pass
- Compensation paid to a disqualified person: Pass
- Assets transferred to a disqualified person: Pass
- Payment to a government official: Pass
- Uncorrected prior self-dealing: Pass
- Prior-year undistributed income: Pass
- Excess business holdings: Pass
- Investments that may jeopardize charitable purposes: Pass
- Uncorrected prior-year jeopardizing investments: Pass
- Attempt to influence legislation: Pass
- Attempt to influence an election: Pass
- Grants to individuals: Pass
- Grants to organizations: Pass
- Spending for a noncharitable purpose: Pass
- Funds received for a personal-benefit contract: Pass
- Premiums paid on a personal-benefit contract: Pass
- Prohibited tax-shelter transaction: Pass
- Filing consistency checks: 9; rating input score 100
Endowment Health
- Endowment-health comparison: 12.61; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Grants: 100% of grant recipient detail disclosed
- Payout: At least 100% grant deployment rate
- Trustees: Filed trustees detail
- Self-dealing: 100% of reviewed questions answered “No”
- Investments: 37th percentile for endowment coverage
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Endowment Health: Endowment-health comparison scored 37/100.