Nicholas James Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
454256644
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2013
Location
Leominster, MA, USA
Phone
5089626663
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Reported finances

Expenses
$794
Assets
$1,717

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STACY L MAILLET (PRESIDENT/DI)

People named in this filing

  • STACY L MAILLET (PRESIDENT/DI)
  • MICHAEL CHAGNON (DIRECTOR)
  • KYMBERLEE ST COUER (TREASURER/DI)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To plan, promote and carryout programs and activities that will benefit, maintain, enrich and improve the health, education, and economic wellbeing of children and families where a child is limited or affected physically, emotionally, or mentally because of autism in any of its forms or symptoms.

What it reported doing in 2021

Plan, promote and carryout programs and activities that will benefit autistic children and their families.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 2
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 4

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.16; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -16.2% per year; rating input score 0; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -19.1% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -21.2% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 4.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $35 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2014 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.