NH Oral Health Coalition

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933154560
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Concord, NH, USA
Phone
6034155550
Rating
53
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$241,645
Expenses
$190,011
Assets
$92,667
Liabilities
$1,829

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Billie Lunt (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Gail Brown (Executive Dir.): $70,922 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Serving as an organizational and communication hub for the informal network of oral health stakeholders within NH, we serve to educate, coordinate, convene, and facilitate instate efforts to advance oral health throughout NH with emphasis on access for the underserved populations. We focus statewide and across the lifespan.

What it reported doing in 2025

The Coalition continues to serve as the connecting hub for the oral health stakeholders in NH. Focusing on connecting, disseminating information, convening, and collaboratively training stakeholders and the public on oral health systems, advancement, and resources within the state. Throughout 2025 we continued network outreach and training on NH Smiles Medicaid Adult Dental Benefit with a focus on providing information on the benefit, how to access care, the numbers and populations served, and the challenges and opportunities moving forward. Participants in trainings and discussion forums included the public, oral health program staff and providers, program decision makers, and others. From a state infrastructure perspective, we worked with the new Medicaid dental director and public health oral health program manager to provide them a comprehensive orientation to the history of the extension of community-based and school-based oral health programs that bring dental and oral heath services into the local communities, thereby increasing access for those with low incomes, and who are un- or under-insured. Additionally, completed a series of issue brief drafts that can be finalized for dissemination via both print and electronics, on the topics of community-based dental and oral health access, community-water fluoridation, and minimally invasive dental care. In December of 2025, we capped off the year with our annual conference bringing together medical/dental providers, educators, funders, program managers, policy makers, the public and others. This was attended by eighty who participated as speakers, panelists, and attendees.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 51
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 0
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 47.2%; rating input score 47
  • Program expense ratio: 60%; rating input score 60
  • Fundraising efficiency: $12.48 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21.4%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 37.3%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 80.9% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 47.2% of revenue deployed · 60% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 6 board members independent · 0 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $114K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $71K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 47/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 7 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.