Nez Perce Farmers County Mutual Fire Insurance Company

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
820191555
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Kendrick, ID, USA
Phone
2082893901
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Mutual Insurance Company & Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$25,890
Expenses
$97,914
Assets
$206,903

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DALE A BARGER (Vice President)
  • DENNIS D BURGESS (President)

People named in this filing

  • CHRISTINA H KOSCHSMEIER (Treasurer)
  • CRISTINA BALES (Director)
  • DALE A BARGER (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Nez perce farmers county mutual fire insurance company is currently the only mutual insurance company in Idaho. The organization provides wind, hail, fire, theft, and vadalism insurance policies to their members at an affordable cost. The organization is owned by its policy holders (members) who all reside in rural Idaho and are located in the counties of clearwater, Idaho, latah, lewis, and nez perce.

What it reported doing in 2025

During the year, nez perce farmers county mutual fire insurance company wrote and renewed no new insurance policies for its members. There were no net loss claims during the year. At year end, the organization had no policies in force to benefit its members.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -278.2%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.11; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 43.9%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -10.2% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.9% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.