Nextmove Dance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232138376
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Phone
- 2156369000
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ballet
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,135
- Expenses
- $226,507
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- IRA S LEFTON ESQ (President)
- NANCY PURCELL (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- IRA S LEFTON ESQ (President)
- NANCY PURCELL (Vice President)
- NILA G BETOF PH D (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Nextmove dance was a leading presenter and producer of dance programs, offering a diverse roster of live performances from the world's leading dance companies, with an emphasis on in-depth and interactive arts education activities for people of all ages. In april, 2018 nextmove signed an integration and co-presenting agreement with the university of Pennsylvania on behalf of its annenberg center for the performing arts. Under the agreement, nextmove and annenberg will jointly present programs of dance at the annenberg center for the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 seasons.
What it reported doing in 2019
Nextmove dance - in april, 2018 nextmove signed an integration and co-presenting agreement with the university of Pennsylvania on behalf of its annenberg center for the performing arts. Under the terms of the agreement, nextmove and annenberg will jointly present programs of dance at the annenberg center for the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 seasons.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 86.1%; rating input score 86
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1,221.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 25.3% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -44% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -30.2% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 86.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $195K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2018 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.