Next Generation Nepal

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
020780463
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2009
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
5419539152
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Children's, Youth Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$155,214
Expenses
$293,851
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANNA HOWE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • CONOR GRENNAN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ANNA HOWE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • SCOTT ROSEFIELD (COMMUNICATION AND ADVOCACY DIRECTOR)
  • SAMJYOR LAMA (NEPAL COUNTRY DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of ngn is to provide support for organizations in nepal which rescue and provide care for destitute and trafficked nepalese children especially refugees of conflict and to reunite children with their families separated by the effects of trafficking.

What it reported doing in 2023

Fgn - fgn includes programs trafficking prevention, reunification, rescue, empowerment and transit home. Trafficking prevention - we support improved educational access and quality in one rural mountain district as a prevention effort in the root causes of vulnerability to trafficking. Reunification - we support the work of searching for families of trafficked children and reconnecting and monitoring family reunification.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 61% for direct work, and 39% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 3
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.7%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 42.1%; rating input score 42

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -89.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.7%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -12.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -10.2% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.7% of revenue deployed · 42.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $124K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.