Newton Development Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 426076592
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Newton, IA, USA
- Phone
- 6417878210
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $206,947
- Expenses
- $169,261
- Assets
- $751,520
- Liabilities
- $9,824
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- FRANK LIEBL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- FRANK LIEBL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $90,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The newton development corporation strives to improve the economic well-being of the newton community. We accomplishthis through collaboration with other community stakeholders to increase investment in newton by retaining, growing, and attracting business. Our success is measured through growth in employment, population, housing, retail sales, taxbase, healthcare accessibility and school enrollment. We will follow these principles and values; honesty, integrity, respect, professionalism, teamwork and an appropriate balance of transparancy and confidentiality.
What it reported doing in 2025
In 2025, ndc privately raised $119,613 from investors. Ndc also received funding of $77,000 through the city of newton via the hotel/motel tax. Ndc was instrumental in the passage of this tax in 2005. The ndc uses the monies received from investors and the city of newton to help promote the growth and sustainability of the newton economy, in turn, creating a healthy and wonderful community for the people to raise families and for people to visit. In 2006, during the departure of maytag, a community vision was created and goals for economic development were created and centered by the guidance of the community vision statement. The funding received by ndc allows for many opportunities.one of the opportunities is for ndc to be part of the greater des moines partnership, a network comprised of adair, clarke, dallas, guthrie, jasper, madison, mahaska, marion, marshall, polk, poweshiek, and warren counties. Annual fees collected from each county has allowed the edonomic directors to leverage monies from the region and state to provide advertising in various site selection publications, create marketing materials and attend various trade shows throughout the united states. The newton development corporation website (www.newtondevelopmentcorporation.com) is another tool for economic development and growth as the website provides information relative to available building and sites, promotes thecommunity and serves as a source of information for new and existing businesses and entrepreneurs.the following outlines several programs the ndc provides as it continues to promote the growth and sustainability of the community. All of these programs could not be possible without the support from the many partners and the enthusiasm from the community and businesses to continue to grow: 1) business retention calls: synchronist surveys completed for every advanced manufacturer in jasper county as confidential data collected is used to provide economic development support in areas of sustainability and growth and build relationships. Work directly with ieda, mid-american and alliant energy as they are strong advocates of the program throughout the state of Iowa. 2) recruiting new business: work directly with ieda and Iowa connections in the recruitment of new companies for the community and the surrounding area. Ieda program managers have visited newton and looked at building and sites so they have a better understanding of what newton has to offer. 3) entrepreneurial and existing business support programs: since 2007 newton development corporation has served over hundreds of participants in a variety of entrepreneurial and existing business support programs through the partnership ofdmacc, jedco, myentre.ent, uni-sbdc, score, city of newton and sba. The newton development corporation coordinates smi-annual calendars outlining programs, classes and events that directly promote and support existing businesses and entrepreneurism.ndc also provides businesses with access to capital by maintaining good relationships with the banks in newton. This is beneficial when directing entrepreneurs and existing business owners when capital is needed.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 61
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 74
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 62.3%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: 75.3%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.84 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 87%; rating input score 87; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.2%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.44; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 53.2%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 62.3% of revenue deployed · 75.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $127K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $90K · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 17/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.