Newmarket Business Improvement District Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
874519402
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Boston, MA, USA
Phone
6172337565
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,016,355
Expenses
$3,700,460
Assets
$2,315,249
Liabilities
$1,028,508

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SUSAN SULLIVAN (PRESIDENT/CLERK)

Highest reported compensation

  • SUSAN SULLIVAN (PRESIDENT/CLERK): $191,374 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of this corporation is to develop, implement, manage, operate, enhance and promote the general welfare of the people within the designated newmarket business improvement district, through activities, programs, and services to include but not be limited to marketing, maintenance, security, planning and physical improvements to the district all being supplemental to those provided by the city of boston.

What it reported doing in 2024

Back2work programin 2018, the newmarket business association, now the newmarket business improvement district (bid), promoted a workforce development program for the homeless to the city, and while it was well received at the time, boston did not have the ability to assist in funding it. In early 2021, newmarket began funding the program ourselves and for the past year and a half, the newmarket business improvement district has managed the program focused on providing low-threshold same-day work for individuals experiencing shelter instability, homelessness and/or a substance use disorder.this effort acknowledges the barriers that these individuals face in both applying for jobs, as well as maintaining their employment, and creates a lower barrier approach to suit their needs.as a result of our early success, the boston department of public health has assisted us with funding during the past year which has led to a significant expansion of the program. We have now assisted over 150 individuals to achieve a life of sobriety and stability.through this initiative, the newmarket bid employs homeless and housing challenged individuals in the mass and cass area to provide supplemental services in cleaning and beautifying the area by providing day jobs including landscape beautification, trash removal, power washing, graffiti removal and similar.we work in close cooperation with the mayor's office, and recovery, shelter & engagement center staff to identify/hire those individuals that have a likelihood of success in this program. We believe that we are the first step toward changing their lives and the sos program provides the next step in the process.participants of this program are reimbursed through cash stipends and/or gift cards, all of which can be used for work clothes, apartment needs, medical needs, or anything else that the person may need. Of course, as you can imagine, these stipends only go so far and we many times end up providing "advances or "extra money" for necessities including boots, shoes, goggles, clean clothes, snacks etc.participants work every day alongside program staff and peer support specialists, who engage them in professional development activities and support their connection to social services, such as housing supports, benefits access, and physical, mental, and behavioral health providers. It is an important component to the program that, while we do not require that individuals are clean when they come into the program, they have to be willing to work toward sobriety/recovery during their first several weeks working with us. We are very proud of the fact that the majority of our workers are currently in recovery/sobriety and all of the others, while not there yet, are in a much better place than they were previously. In addition, it is also an important part of the program that we find more stable housing for our workers and while the vast majority were previously living in tents or on the street, they are now living in low threshold, supportive housing or in sro's or apartments.the end goal of this initiative is to provide our workers with the opportunity to be hired by local companies in part-time or full-time positions. We have placed more than 75 individuals into jobs and expect to increase that number in fy26.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 72% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.3%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 84.8%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.24 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.9%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.63; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.44; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.2%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 34.9% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.3% of revenue deployed · 84.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $3.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $191K · 23 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $1.9M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 31/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.