Newcourtland at Allegheny Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 460812150
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Phone
- 2159514427
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Real Estate Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $265,288
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- R Max Kent (President)
People named in this filing
- Tim McGrath (Board Member)
- Andrew Seibert (Board Member)
- Mary Naylor (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization holds title to property, collects income from the property, and turns over the entire amount of such income less expenses, to NewCourtland Elder Services, Inc. NewCourtland Elder Services is a 501(c)(3) organization whose primary purpose is to provide for the needs of persons who are sick, disabled, aged or disadvantaged, regardless of their race, color or creed. The use of the property will be consistent with the mission of NewCourtland Elder Services, Inc.
What it reported doing in 2020
Maintain a building occupied by a health clinic. Revenue is from the rent collected.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 41
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -51.4% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -17.2% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -17.9% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 4 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $265K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 10 of 11 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2015 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.