Newburyport Elementary Parent Teacher Organization
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 043570772
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Newburyport, MA, USA
- Phone
- 9784654431
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $93,873
- Expenses
- $86,273
- Assets
- $152,261
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Emily Stroeher (Co-President)
- Sandra Schwarzkopf (Co-President)
People named in this filing
- Emily Stroeher (Co-President)
- Sandra Schwarzkopf (Co-President)
- Shannon Cormier (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To organize and sponsor educational and social programs that benefit and support the children, families, and faculty of the Bresnahan, Molin, and Nock schools, to work to secure volunteers to support the PTOs various programs, and to serve as an advisory body for Newburyport Public School administrators.
What it reported doing in 2024
School Enrichment Program- Events to foster a deepercurriculum understanding in areas such as Language Arts, History and Performing Arts.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.2%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 93.6%; rating input score 94
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.1%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.76; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 25.6% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 27.6% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20.3% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.2% of revenue deployed · 93.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $81K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 25 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.