Newark-wayne Community Hospital Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222963344
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Newark, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5859221595
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $387,172
- Expenses
- $1,153,930
- Assets
- $7,501,763
- Liabilities
- $1,658,105
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RICHARD DAVIS PHD (CEO)
- DANIEL IRELAND (PRESIDENT, FINGER LAKES RU)
- KELLY GAGAN (PRESIDENT, FOUNDATIONS)
- KELLY MCCORMICK-SULLIVAN (FORMER PRESIDENT, FOUNDATIONS)
Highest reported compensation
- RICHARD DAVIS PHD (CEO): $4,013,008 total reported compensation
- THOMAS CRILLY (CFO): $1,716,134 total reported compensation
- JENNIFER ESLINGER (COO): $1,548,389 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide funds to or for the benefit of newark wayne community hospital, inc. By (a) soliciting, accepting, holding, investing, reinvesting and administering gifts, grants, bequests, contributions, devises, benefits of trusts, endowments and property of any kind, without limitation as to amount or value; and (b) using, disbursing or paying the income or principle thereof exclusively for the foregoing purposes.
What it reported doing in 2024
Conduct activities that raise funds and to invest such funds for the benefit of newark wayne community hospital and other organizations with similar purposes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 95% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 60.6%; rating input score 61
- Fundraising efficiency: $0.48 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -198%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.5; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 22.7%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -11.4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 60.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $700K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $4M · 18 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 53 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 4/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.