New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Association, Inc.
Legal name: New York State Correctional Officers & Police Benevolent Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 141802469
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Albany, NY, US
- Phone
- 518.427.1551
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Labor Unions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,987,480
- Expenses
- $14,200,062
- Assets
- $33,051,340
- Liabilities
- $8,398,267
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRIS SUMMERS (EXEC VP/PRESIDENT)
- KENNETH GOLD (VICE PRESIDENT WESTERN REGION)
- JOHN ROBERTS (VICE PRESIDENT NORTHERN REGION)
- JOE HORACEK (VICE PRESIDENT MID HUDSON REGION)
- JOHN HARMON (VICE PRESIDENT LAW ENFORCEMENT)
- BRIAN HLUSKA (VICE PRESIDENT CENTRAL REGION)
Highest reported compensation
- CHRIS SUMMERS (EXEC VP/PRESIDENT): $29,673 total reported compensation
- MATTHEW KEOUGH (EXEC VP/NORTHERN SS): $26,863 total reported compensation
- KENNETH GOLD (VICE PRESIDENT WESTERN REGION): $24,656 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary purpose and objective of nyscopba is to improve the terms and conditions of employment of members of the security services bargaining units of the state of New York, to represent such employees in collective bargaining pursuant to article 14 of the civil service law of the state of New York and to achieve legislative gains and to otherwise bring together and promote the welfare of such employees.
What it reported doing in 2025
The primary purpose and objective of nyscopba is to improve the terms and conditions of employment of the members of the security services bargaining units of the state of New York.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.2%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.33; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.5%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 0 of 10 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $30K · 11 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $3.2M reported
- Consistency: 12 of 12 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.