New York State Association of Realtors Disaster Relief Fund Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
203543722
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Albany, NY, USA
Phone
5184630300
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Public Foundations

Reported finances

Expenses
$25,075
Assets
$53,214
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOSEPH RIVELLINO (PRESIDENT)
  • JACQLENE ROSE (PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • JENNIFER VUCETIC (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN VERNAZZA (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • DUNCAN MACKENZIE (SECRETARY/NYSAR CEO)

People named in this filing

  • JOSEPH RIVELLINO (PRESIDENT)
  • JACQLENE ROSE (PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • JENNIFER VUCETIC (PAST PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To raise or receive funds to provide charitable support to individuals or entities affected by a personal or natural disaster with preferance to those individuals or entities residing and/or situated in New York state.

What it reported doing in 2024

To provide charitable support to individuals or entities affected by a personal or natural disaster with a preference to those individuals or entities residing and/or situated in New York state.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.12; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 17.6% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $25K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.