New York State Alliance for Retired Americans Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 161638926
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2016
- Location
- Latham, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5187836231
- Rating
- 41
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Seniors' Rights
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,313
- Expenses
- $141,963
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAUL SCHUH (LABOR VICE PRESIDENT)
- MOLLY KRAKOWSKI (COMMUNITY VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- PAUL SCHUH (LABOR VICE PRESIDENT)
- MOLLY KRAKOWSKI (COMMUNITY VICE PRESIDENT)
- DORIS WELCH (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To advance the living conditions of retired workers, the elderly, and their families by creating a network of organizations of retired workers to educate retired workers and the general public on issues of importance to seniors.
What it reported doing in 2016
The New York state alliance for retired americans provided assistance to our six regional chapters as they held organizational and programmatic meetings during the year. Staff and volunteers also coordinated advocacy and educational campaigns throughout the year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 9
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 13.9%; rating input score 14
- Program expense ratio: 0.8%; rating input score 1
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1,607.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 20.7% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -16.3% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 13.9% of revenue deployed · 0.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 14/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.