New York Society for Post-acute and Long-term Care

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933476231
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Webster, NY, USA
Phone
6316003297
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$144,584
Expenses
$43,087
Assets
$132,312
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Paula Lester (President)
  • Ruth Spinner (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Paula Lester (President)
  • Ruth Spinner (Vice President)
  • Scott Schabel (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Promote excellence in medical care and to improve the quality of life in residential health care facilities; to promote peer education and consultation among physicians, APRNs and PAs caring for residents in residential health care facilities; to disseminate information in long-term care medical administration and practice by convening educational seminars and workshops.

What it reported doing in 2024

Education Conferences and meetings, 95 attendees, awarded continuing medical education credits, educational topics included substance use disorder, healthy eating, telemedicine, geriatric emergency care, arthritis, electrolyte disturbances, collaborative practice, anticoagulation, hospice & palliative care, cardiomyopathies, trauma-informed care.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 88
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 36.8%; rating input score 37
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 70.2%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.07; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 68.2% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 94.7% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 124.4% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 36.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $53K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.