New York Hota Sport Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
113295593
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Flushing, NY, USA
Phone
7183583602
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Sports Associations &Training Facilities

Reported finances

Revenue
$108,098
Expenses
$140,827
Assets
$49,974
Liabilities
$7,413

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAN FISHER (PRESIDENT)
  • DIETER EMMERLING (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DAN FISHER (PRESIDENT)
  • DIETER EMMERLING (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • THERESA CATALIOTI (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The New York hota sport club, inc., since its inception in 1964, is an organization of people long devoted to and participating in amateur soccer and amateur tennis. They organzed the club to participate in local, state, regional and national competition in these two sports, by organizing teams and instructing them in the necessary athletic skills as well as the qualities of good sportsmanship. The club provides some soccer balls and tennis balls, but members provide all other equipment, including uniforms. The club maintains the tennis courts it uses, on the grounds of the plattdeutsch altenheim gesellschaft von brooklyn und umgegang, inc. (an irc section 501 (c) (3) exempt senior citizen home). For the soccer games/ practices, the club uses fields on the grounds of the same senior citizen home, and it maintains those fields as necessary and appropriate.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -30.3%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -20.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.