New York Dental Affiliates Pc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 463353836
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6466723651
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Group Health Practice (Health Maintenance Organizations)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $22,597,600
- Expenses
- $22,597,600
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAMES KING DDS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- VICTOR BADNER DMD (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ROBERT PELLECCHIA DDS (DIRECTOR): $572,754 total reported compensation
- VICTOR BADNER DMD (PRESIDENT): $506,029 total reported compensation
- JAMES KING DDS (VICE PRESIDENT): $484,667 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Operating as an integral part of the nyc health + hospitals ("h+h"), formerly the New York city health and hospitals corporation. Nyda will further h+h's tax-exempt charitable, scientific, and educational purposes by enhancing the accessibility, quality and cost-efficiency of health care services provided in the greater New York city community. Nyda dentists and allied staff will provide dental care and related services to anyone who seeks diagnosis, treatment, and care without regard to race, color, creed, sex, age, disability, national origin, sexual orientation, or poverty status.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provided professional dental services to the metropolitan New York city area under an affiliation agreement with nyc health + hospitals, formerly the New York city health and hospitals corporation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 32
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 99.5%; rating input score 99
- Program expense ratio: 99.5%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 26.2%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 99.5% of revenue deployed · 99.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 11 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $22.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $573K · 16 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 16 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.