New York Common Pantry
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133127972
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- (917) 720-9700
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Soup Kitchens
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $24,345,029
- Expenses
- $23,760,230
- Assets
- $27,249,246
- Liabilities
- $9,708,507
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
37 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GRIMALDI STEPHEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- SECON JUDITH (DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- GRIMALDI STEPHEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $427,925 total reported compensation
- SECON JUDITH (DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $227,893 total reported compensation
- MURTHA DEANA (SENIOR DIRECTOR-INSTITUTIONAL GIVING): $156,022 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
New York Common Pantry reduces hunger and promotes dignity, health and self-sufficiency.
What it reported doing in 2024
Choice pantry bronx: choice pantry bronx distributes a variety of wholesome and healthy foods via 'pantry packages' to any low-income new yorker, emphasizing those residing in the bronx. In fy25, the program operated on a tuesday-to-saturday schedule for enrollment and emergency packages and distributed regular pantry packages from thursday to saturday. In fy25, the program served 1,759,692 meals (a 12% increase from fy24) to 127,078 visitors (an increase of 7% from fy24). The cost per meal at choice pantry bronx was $0.90.total expenses: $1,580,964help 365: helped 365 bronx, manhattan, and mobile programs screened and accessed resources for 61,155 low-income new yorkers in fy25. The program comprises help 365 bronx, help 365 manhattan, and the help 365 mobile team. The mobile team focuses on snap benefits and travels to communities where data indicates there is underutilization of the benefit. Together, these three help 365 programs cost $1,556,411 and directly accessed $10,148,290 for those served, a return on investment (roi) of $6.52 for every dollar spent.total expenses: $1,556,411live healthy!: the live healthy! Delivers nutrition education and food equity interventions to culturally diverse snap-eligible populations at risk for food insecurity. The program serves new yorkers across all boroughs, providing resources for partner organizations through print and virtual efforts. The live healthy program hosts nutrition education workshops virtually and at partner sites throughout the communities served. Over 280 workshops were offered in fy25, serving 7,547 visitors. Live healthy program also leads food equity initiatives: foodmd, a fruit and vegetable prescription program, and farm share, a community-supported agriculture model. Foodmd works with federally qualified health centers and other clinical community partners to screen and refer patients experiencing food-related chronic disease and food insecurity within the household. 24 unique participants visitors participated in foodmd workshops in fy25. The farm share initiative provided over 124,005 lbs. Of food to 530 unique individuals in fy25. This program was eliminated due to changes in federal funding. Staffing and program were thus impacted in fy25 and the program will need to find alternative funding sources in fy26 and beyond.total expenses: $1,100,403hot meals: the hot meal program primarily serves the homeless and those unable to provide food in their homes for themselves. In fy25, it operated over 250 lunch events and served 47,574 meals. The brown bag service (food distributed on days when the hot meal program was not administered) served 20,386 meals. The cost per meal for brown bags and hot meals in fy25 was $9.63.total expenses: $654,521project dignity: project dignity provides various critical services to the homeless, including showers, haircuts, laundry, mail, psychiatric support, and housing referral and placement. In fy25, the program provided 3,010 showers, helped 188 guests use nycp as their mailing address, referred/assisted 31 people to/with tele-health psychiatric services, and completed 30 housing applications. The program accessed $619,560 in resources for homeless guests, with a return on investment (roi) of $2.55 for every $1 spent on the program.total expenses: $242,825
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 72% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.3%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 79.5%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.36 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.4%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.15; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.2%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.6% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 10 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 78.3% of revenue deployed · 79.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 31 of 31 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $18.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $428K · 37 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.