New York City Veterinary Emergency Response Team (Nyc Vert)inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 204749463
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Valley Stream, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5167917858
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $1,719
- Assets
- $11,973
- Liabilities
- $5,285
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- JOHN J CHAROS DVM (TREASURER)
- BARBARA A KALVIGDVM (DIRECTOR)
- JAMES M SHORTER DVM (TRUSTEE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
New York city veterinary emergency response team is a volunteer group of veterinarians and animal health professionals dedicated to the support of New York city's working and companion animals in times of disaster. When called upon by local goverment, authorized non-profit agencies, nyc-vert will mobilize to assist in the following areas: i. Triage, emergency medical treatment, and on site support of working animals at designated emergency response locations. Ii. Medical assessment, and temporary relocation, care and provision of shelter for companion animals during designated city crises. Iii. Cooperation before, during and in the aftermath of emergencies in planning and preparedness activities to ensure dissemenation of accurate crisis response information.
What it reported doing in 2024
See primary exempt purpose
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.97; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.44; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -42.8% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -29.3% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.