New York City Brownfield Partnership Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273846593
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 9738969277
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $177,155
- Expenses
- $160,241
- Assets
- $134,912
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EZGI KARAYEL (PRESIDENT)
- GEORGE DUKE (VICE PRESIDENT)
- LAURA SENKEVITCH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- LAURA SENKEVITCH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- EZGI KARAYEL (PRESIDENT)
- GEORGE DUKE (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MICHELE ROGERS (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Serve as a resource for brownfield redevelopment in nyc, supporting the education and training of brownfield professionals, workers and students.
What it reported doing in 2024
Annual awards event recognizing affordable housing, innovationcommunity outreach and open space projects within nyc and present them with a nyc brownfield award.10 entities
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 69% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 46
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 44.3%; rating input score 44
- Program expense ratio: 49%; rating input score 49
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.5%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.84; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.5% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 44.3% of revenue deployed · 49% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $78K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2012 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 49/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.