New York Area Chapter Society for Marketing Professionals
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133373593
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6314275665
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $62,917
- Expenses
- $50,809
- Assets
- $183,865
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ERIKA MOSHKOVICH CPSM (PRESIDENT)
- NATASHA CAMARILLO TERM BEGAN 0320 (VICE PRESIDENT/PRESIDENT ELECT)
- OLIVIA SONIA FARQUHARSON CDMP PCM (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ERIKA MOSHKOVICH CPSM (PRESIDENT)
- NATASHA CAMARILLO TERM BEGAN 0320 (VICE PRESIDENT/PRESIDENT ELECT)
- OLIVIA SONIA FARQUHARSON CDMP PCM (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The society for marketing professional services (smps) is a non-profit organization that advances the marketing and business development professions within the aec industry. The smps-ny chapter, founded in 1983, has been a driving force in shaping the future of marketing in the region, offering its members valuable resources, educational opportunities, and networking events to promote growth and excellence.smps mission: business transformed through marketing leadership. Our mission is to engage, inspire, and empower a/e/c professionals for leadership and lifelong learning.
What it reported doing in 2024
Supplier diversity navigating diversity and compliance on public & private projects: dynamic panel discussion focused on aec industry design and construction projects. Most large New York city public design and construction projects require 30% minority, women, or locally based business enterprise (mwlbe) participation, as well as a 40% women and minority workforce, as part of the project requirements. Many private-sector clients have inclusion goals on their projects, as well. Clients have become increasingly savvy and mindful about what type of diversity compliance has a positive impact, compared to simply demonstrating a good faith effort. Esg requirements for global corporations, which include supplier and workforce diversity tracking, are also finding their way into rfps and contracts for private sector clients. This information session provided the following takeaways for attendees: 1) learn about effective strategies to meet diversity goals, 2) identify ways to make your team shine with a great diversity compliance plan and 3) have a positive impact on the community. Panel members included: michael j. Garner, chief business diversity officer, the city of New York wayne lambert, director of supplier diversity, turner and townsend kimberly hardy, senior vice president for diversity, inclusion, and compliance jodine miller, assistant vice president for diversity, inclusion and compliance, mckissack & mckissack
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 85% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.2%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.62; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -9.2% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.