New Ulm Figure Skating Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411572312
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
New Ulm, MN, USA
Phone
5073547469
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$171,904
Expenses
$130,244
Assets
$226,302
Liabilities
$986

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANN HOFFMANN (PRESIDENT)
  • TRACI LARSON (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ANN HOFFMANN (PRESIDENT)
  • TRACI LARSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • HEIDI REWITZER (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide instruction, practice and advancement of each member of the club in all aspects of the sport of figure skating; to encourage and cultivate a feeling of sportsmanship and friendship among all ice skaters; and to carry out the policies and objectives of the international skating institute (isi) and the united states figure skating association (usfs).

What it reported doing in 2025

Provided structured group skating instruction to beginner & intermediate skaters- served 140 youth participants across 4 sessions. Competitive figure skating program for 225 skaters. Organized and hosted an annual ice show to showcase skater development and engage the community- 79 skaters and 400 attendees. Promoted access to skating and health activity through outreach and financial support- served 43 first-time skaters.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 72%; rating input score 72
  • Program expense ratio: 97.2%; rating input score 97

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24.2%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.74; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.5%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.9% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 72% of revenue deployed · 97.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $127K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.