New Prague Community Sportsman Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411587822
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
New Prague, MN, USA
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$56,176
Expenses
$3,600
Assets
$128,551
Liabilities
$2,857

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • WILLIAM BARTUSEK (CEO/PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN BUSCH (VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MAUREEN FRANEK (GAMBLING MANAGER): $20,400 total reported compensation
  • JOHN GIESEN (SECRETARY/TREASURER): $1,500 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote sportsmanship; to cooperate with the department of conservation in the protection of upland game & fish; provide feed & habitat for upland game & fish.

What it reported doing in 2024

Monthly meetings are held to discuss sportsmanship issues and concerns in protecting upland game & fish with upcoming activities and events. The following are some programs made possible with gambling proceeds includes: 1. The club hosts an annual fishing tournament to promote sportsmanship. The fishing tournament had around 30 volunteers. 2. Youth fishing clinic: sponsored a youth fishing clinic. The clinic teaches casting techniques and bait selection. Each attendant receives a grab bag of fishing supplies. This clinic had about 60 volunteers. Other programs included: adopt a highway services annually had around 30 volunteers mallard hoop notes had around 20 volunteers cedar lake aeration 40 volunteers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 89% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 53% for direct work, and 47% for grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 27
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 4.9%; rating input score 5
  • Program expense ratio: 73.4%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 93.6%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 35.71; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 608.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -19.7% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 22% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 4.9% of revenue deployed · 73.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $20K · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 5/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.