New Pond Farm Education Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
061110833
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
West Redding, CT, USA
Phone
2039382117
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Environmental Education and Outdoor Survival Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,305,162
Expenses
$1,449,533
Assets
$9,597,927
Liabilities
$35,383

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANN BOSTELMANN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (END 12/24))
  • PRIYA DESAI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (BEG 11/24))
  • MASAKO NAKAMUTA-VIGNEAULT (Vice President & Director)
  • THOMAS SAGGIOMO (PRESIDENT & DIRECTOR)
  • DEB RAKICH (Vice President & Director)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANN BOSTELMANN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (END 12/24)): $136,149 total reported compensation
  • PRIYA DESAI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (BEG 11/24)): $21,589 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

On every acre, in all we do, we plant seeds for a lifetime of active engagement with the natural world.

What it reported doing in 2024

New pond farm educational center offers programs on the environment, agriculture, native american studies, astronomy and the arts. Our 102-acre property, with its many outdoor teaching sites, allows us to share discovery programs in many natural habitats. We are proud of our work with area schools, where more than 5,000 children venture to the education center each year for hands-on field trips that bring their classroom studies to life and connect them to the natural world. Students learn about our natural ecosystems and make meaningful connections so they will want to become responsible stewards. As a member of the national "no child left inside coalition", our efforts in environmental education combat the much studied and documented "nature deficit disorder." many local schools look to new pond farm to provide a window into the past lives of eastern woodland indians. Our authentically recreated encapment with thatched longhouse, barked wigwam, food storage pit, and fire circle is an exceptonal outdoor classroom. Students actively scrape deer hides, grind corn with a mortar and pestle, and sample traditional woodland indian fare as they sit by the fire, learning how our local tribes lived off the land. The "native american museum" in our learning center, filled with genuine and living artifacts found on the property by archeologists, helps to round out the program and bring the in-school curriculum to life. New pond farm offers a chance to be a part of a working farm and make connections with where our food really comes from (not just the grocery store). Visitors participate in farm chores, collect warm eggs, watch our farmers milk members of the herd, try their hands at spinning fleece from our sheep, and purchase dairy products, meats and yarn. Students of all ages can watch our heifers mature into cows and join the herd. They can watch our sheep being shorn and our chickens taking dust baths. They see our hard working farmers fertilizing the pastures in the fall with our composted manure and then taking off bales of hay in the spring. The farm chores become a very understandable part of their education. We round our programs with evening classes at our astronomy center, where visitors can view planets and constellations with our 14" celestron telescope with "go to" capabilities, and we also offer a chance for middle and high school actors to participate in our renowned winter and summer shakespeare programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.6%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 72.9%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: $3.95 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11.1%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.62; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.9%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.6% of revenue deployed · 72.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $136K · 18 people listed
  • Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 13/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.