New Philharmonia Orchestra of Massachusetts Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 043283336
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2021, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Newton Lower Falls, MA, USA
- Phone
- 7819853291
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Music
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $152,374
- Expenses
- $171,789
- Assets
- $13,884
- Liabilities
- $13,979
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN TARRH RETIRED 63025 (FORMER PRESIDENT)
- SLATER CRAM (CO-PRESIDENT)
- PATRICK ALVES (CO-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOHN TARRH RETIRED 63025 (FORMER PRESIDENT)
- SLATER CRAM (CO-PRESIDENT)
- PATRICK ALVES (CO-PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide amateurs and other musicians with an orchestra in which to play and to provide music in all its forms for the benefit of the community and others.
What it reported doing in 2024
To provide amateurs and other musicians with an orchestrain which to play and to provide music in all its forms forthe benefit of the community and others.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 57
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 17
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.2%; rating input score 59
- Program expense ratio: 52.5%; rating input score 53
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -12.7%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.01; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.8% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.2% of revenue deployed · 52.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $90K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.