New Pathways NOLA Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
814176214
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
New Orleans, LA, USA
Phone
5045868509
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Educational Services and Schools - Other

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$31
Expenses
$39,206
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Peggy Mendoza (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Peggy Mendoza (CEO)
  • Jay Altman (Chairman)
  • Anthony Recasner (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Building cross-sector solutions for New Orleans youth with significant needs

What it reported doing in 2020

We successfully engaged partners in shared projects that would not have been initiated but for our leadership. Our projects leveraged information and expertise of individual partners in each sector, who have valuable information but alone, cannot sustain systemic change. As an intermediary, our leadership scaffolded all partners contributions to define a comprehensive landscape of existing services versus unmet needs, allowing us to better meet the needs of local youth. - We founded the Special Education Consortium SpEC, consisting of nonprofit organizations and government that collectively support special education services, programming, and curriculum in New Orleans Public Schools. Members of SpEC are the Orleans Parish School Board OPSB, New Schools for New Orleans, the Special Education Leader Fellowship, and the Center for Resilience. Through collaboration and alignment amongst SpEC members and schools, we will improve and strengthen the continuum of placements that should exist in each school and in our system as a whole. We articulated a citywide vision for special education services for 5000 students with disabilities. We completed a first-of-its-kind comprehensive catalogue to document existing specialized programming for students with significant disabilities, and also compared known student needs to make recommendations on necessary program scaling and launch to better meet student need citywide. We convened a stakeholder group of SPEC members and charter schools to collaboratively design a citywide portfolio of specialized programs and iterate solutions to major barriers that were hindering specialized programs from launching or scaling. Our working group outlined the components of an effective citywide infrastructure to support school-based programs, and made major progress towards designing policy solutions to support this infrastructure. We look forward to this work continuing over the coming years. - We spearheaded a collaborative process to advise Childrens Hospital New Orleans on new services to address students unmet health needs. We interviewed school representatives representing over 20,000 students. We seated an inclusive steering committee with 20 representatives from schools, health providers, and government to advise Childrens Hospital, identifying 5 possible services: universal mental health screen and connection to services, tele-heath, family engagement, hospital discharge coordination, acute mental health crisis coordination. Using an inclusive rubric and process developed and managed by NPNO, four schools were selected to pilot a partnership with Childrens Hospital New Orleans to deliver the five identified services across four unique geographic areas in the city, some of which have been underserved. - We fostered public awareness about local youth needs and how public systems can better meet their needs and prevent justice system involvement. We coordinated over ten youth-serving organizations to interview over 100 local youth about their perspectives on crime, schools, community, and their needs. We designed the project and facilitated consensus around interview questions and data collection. Findings were presented to City Council. - We began planning a Restorative Justice Collaborative for public schools with high populations of at-risk youth.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 99% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -126,371%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -112.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -108.8% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $39K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.