New Nations Center Nntdc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 821207185
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Phone
- 4695810614
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Centers, Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $13,900
- Expenses
- $8,100
- Assets
- $8,800
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Justin Hall (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Justin Hall (Executive Director)
- Melanie Verdell (Women's Development)
- Cherice Davis (Outreach Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Mission of New Nation Youth Center is to assist with the transition to the higher standard of culture of today's youth. We produce productive, well-equipped youth ready to enact change which benefits our society. Stabilizing communities by assisting with social services that benefit the participants we serve via educational services, job development, mentoring and a host of other programs.
What it reported doing in 2021
Program provides services in, Anger Management (Loss of Freedom, Respect, Identifying Triggers, How to express your anger, What do you do when your angry, How anger effects your health, Understanding your anger), Social skills (Human Interactions, Understanding Emotions, Self-Control) Career Development ( Interviewing Skills, Retention, Dealing with Co-Workers, Importance of following company rules, Employment Laws), Finding your life's purpose, Finances (Art of Budgeting, Living on Your Own, Buying a Home, Credit, Saving and Investing, In Financial Trouble), Supportive Relationships (What is a Healthy Relationship, Healthy vs Unhealthily Relationships, Relationship Boundaries). These classes are given twice a month from January to December. Each topic will identify the participants individual problem, understand their problem and develop a plan to correct their problem. Through both text and real-world situations, participant are able to gain a better understanding of the issues that might hinder their development in life and also learn how to deal with problems that may pose issues in the future. This will prepare youth and young adults for a more stable future, giving them the tools, they need to maintain a positive production way of life. Participants are also involved with community service efforts to help boost a sense of self-pride. This program will continue with the expansion into the community to help the youth and young adults in Dallas County. Currently, teenagers and young adults between the ages of 16 and 24 are neither working nor in school. The youth disconnection rate in greater Dallas is 14.9 percent; approximately 128,000 teens and young adults there are not working or in school. The least connected neighborhoods in the DFW area are Oak Cliff and South Dallas at 25%, Southeast Dallas (Bucker Terrace, Everglade Park, Pleasant Grove) at 25.1%, Fair Park and West Dallas at 34.4%, while other areas in the DFW have an overall 15.6%. Our goal is to lower these numbers over 5 years period through our mentoring and educational programs, community activities, and sports programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 51.1%; rating input score 51
- Program expense ratio: 87.7%; rating input score 88
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 41.7%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.09; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 53.3% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 48.2% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 53.3% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 51.1% of revenue deployed · 87.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2018 to 2021
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.