New Name Counseling and Teaching Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
261664564
IRS 990 coverage
2018–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Dawsonville, GA, USA
Phone
7702658128
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Protestant
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$305,089
Expenses
$312,560
Assets
$117,795
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JASON GLAZE (PRESIDENT/EXECUTIVE DIRECT)

Highest reported compensation

  • JASON GLAZE (PRESIDENT/EXECUTIVE DIRECT): $132,800 total reported compensation
  • TAMELA MITCHELL (DIRECTOR): $81,800 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our mission is to glorify god and serve our community by assisting people in finding freedom from their past, peace in their present, and hope for their future.

What it reported doing in 2025

Coaching leadership mentorship: executive coaching is designed for those who are in leadership positions or who aspire to leadership positions. Various assessment products are generally used at the beginning of the coaching engagement to help gain self-awareness and identify strengths, struggles, and competencies. Any leader who wants to strengthen their leadership, communication, and influence skills may benefit from executive coaching.career coaching works well for those in career transition and looking to explore opportunities in their vocational life. Various personality and strengths-based assessments may be used to help understand your unique, personal wiring and pursue opportunities most aligned with your values and interests. Career coaching also provides relational support through the uncertainty that comes with times of transition.life coaching provides an opportunity for those who want to work with a coach to understand their life purpose and gain greater clarity on what they want in life. Beliefs, values, and identity are explored as well as the importance of priorities and boundaries. Once priorities are established, boundaries become easier to identify and maintain, resulting in greater discernment over what is and what is not a good fit for you. Getting to know your full self, how you think and feel as well as how your body, soul, and spirit align, brings greater awareness of who you are, your giftedness, your calling. The coaching process can be useful in helping you sustain a life of balance and vitality.our coaching engagement generally lasts from 3-6 months (6-12 sessions), meeting twice per month.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 38
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 74.4%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 72.8%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: $14.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 33.3%; rating input score 33; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.4%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 68.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 74.4% of revenue deployed · 72.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 1 of 3 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $227K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $133K · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 33/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 47/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.