New Mexico Womens Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
850372005
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Santa Fe, NM, USA
Phone
5059836155
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$66,762
Expenses
$101,106
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JANE ELLEN DAVIS (President)

People named in this filing

  • ROHNA YORK KOESTER (Treasurer)
  • JODY SOPER (Director)
  • NICOLE WESLEY (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We support organizations and programs that create economic opportunities for New Mexico's women and girls.

What it reported doing in 2014

We provide mentoring and financial support to women's cooperatives around the state. In 2014 we gave $1,000 micro grants to five cooperatives and one $982 micro grant to another cooperative to support their work with local women in the production of products which they brought to market.we host annual sales venues called rag rug & art marketplaces in las cruces and santa fe where women come together not only to sell their products but to learn from peer-to-peer mentoring. This investment in women fosters confidence, self esteem and promotes financial stability. All proceeds from our marketplaces go directly to the artisans.nmwf volunteers also provide mentoring where needed in business skills, marketing, product development, how to display crafts and sales techniques.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 90% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 6
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.3%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 61.6%; rating input score 62

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -51.4%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 37.5%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -7.4% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -23.7% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -50.6% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93.3% of revenue deployed · 61.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $62K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.