New Mexico Teen Pregnancy Coalition

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
850310621
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2012
Location
Albuquerque, NM, USA
Phone
5052548737
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Children's, Youth Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$510,477
Expenses
$509,840
Assets
$304,094
Liabilities
$8,954

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

New Mexico teen pregnancy coalition is dedicated to sponsoring programs and activities aimed at reducing teen pregnancy, addressing the negative consequences of teen pregnancy and improving teen parenting in New Mexico.

What it reported doing in 2012

The New Mexico teen pregnancy coalition's three major programs include plain talk, wyman teen outreach program and New Mexico young fathers program and male involvement. Plain talk is seminars to teach parents how to talk to their children and train young people on peer to peer plain talk on various regions in New Mexico. The wymen teen outreach program purpose is to prevent adolescent problem behaviors by enhancing normative processes of social development and to engage young people in a high level of structured, volunteer community service that is closely linked to classroom-based discussions of future life options such as those surrounding future career and relationship decisions. The New Mexico young fathers program purpose is to recruit and engage teen fathers, who are the parenting partners of teen mothers, to strengthen their parenting skills, provide job skills training, to address paternity and child support issues, to focus on healthy relationship building, and to develop qualified participants into effective peer mentors.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 97% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.1%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.6; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 14.1%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $463K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $72K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2012
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.