New Mexico Public Health Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
850265423
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Albuquerque, NM, USA
Phone
5057507159
Rating
71
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$142,246
Expenses
$141,565
Assets
$159,489
Liabilities
$3,236

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GABRIELLE MANCHEGO-SANCHEZ (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • TAYLER LOPEZ (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • ASHLEY WEGELE (CO-PRESIDENT)
  • KAYLA BLANCHARD (CO-PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • PALOMA FLORES (EXECUTIVE DI): $85,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote the public health practice, policies, and systems that support health equity in New Mexico by providing a forum for sharing research and practices, and serving as a base for leadership development, networking, and action.

What it reported doing in 2024

Health policy forum & other advocacy activities 2.nmpha fridays: spring through fall of 2024 nmpha continued our virtual friday lunchtime discussion series to the summer and fall 2024 academic cycle to highlight important state policy issues, advocates and key collaborators health policy forum & other advocacy activities 1.annual policy forum nmpha hosted its 21st annual health policy legislative forum (speak for health and wellness) on dec. 5, 2024, which convened organizations and advocates working toward state policy change in New Mexico. The forum provided an opportunity to share potential and proposed legislation and build alliances. The 2024 forum included: - 191 registrants - 1 keynote speaker - community voice: dr. Bill wagner, centro savila - local officials health panel - discussion panel: health equity and social justice - legislative policy proposal session w/ 19 pitches from state policy advocates - discussion panel: public health & policy 2. Public health day on monday, feb 12, 2024, nmpha co-hosted the 9th annual public health day at the state capitol rotunda. The in-person event was co-sponsored by leading public health organizations in New Mexico and included a discussion of current legislation to support public health in the 2024 state legislative session

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 87% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 69
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.6%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 71.4%; rating input score 71
  • Fundraising efficiency: $2.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.5%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.13; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 60%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -12.8% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70.6% of revenue deployed · 71.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $101K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $85K · 17 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 12/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.