New Mexico Psychological Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850349452
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Albuquerque, NM, USA
- Phone
- 5058837376
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $113,151
- Expenses
- $91,768
- Assets
- $311,677
- Liabilities
- $766
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KEVIN KINZIE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- KAISA MARSHALL PHD (PRESIDENT)
- JILL HOLTZ PHD (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- DEBORAH OKON PHD (PAST PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- KEVIN KINZIE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- KAISA MARSHALL PHD (PRESIDENT)
- JILL HOLTZ PHD (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the New Mexico psychological association is to advance psychology as a science and profession and to promote human well-being.
What it reported doing in 2025
Development & presentation of continuing education, seminars, workshops, and conferences for New Mexico psychologists and other mental health service providers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 16
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 14.4%; rating input score 14
- Program expense ratio: 19.7%; rating input score 20
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.9%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.4; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 47.5%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -10.3% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.4% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 14.4% of revenue deployed · 19.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $18K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 14/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 20/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 44/100.